Paper details

The task of this assignment is to write an essay about The Namesake to analyze how Gogol\’s definition of home changes from his childhood to his teenage and college years to his adulthood. You should include the following: A thesis statement which expresses how Gogol\’s definition of home changes throughout the novel. Discussion of where Gogol lives/stays/visits in his childhood, teenage years, college years and adulthood Gogol’s thoughts and feelings about each place in his childhood, teenage years, college years and adulthood Information and quotations from the novel (The Namesake) to support and illustrate Gogol\’s thoughts, feelings, and definitions of \”home\” in these various stages/places Analysis – your words (transitions and connections) explaining these quotes and examples from the novel The Rubric that will be used to grade this assignment is: Ideas /4: The topic, focus, and details convey information powerfully with valid inferences. Organization /4: The organization is clear and easy to follow. Transitions provide coherence. Voice /4: The voice sounds natural and knowledgeable and is appropriate for the audience. Word Choice /4: Words are specific and figures of speech are used. Sentence Fluency /4: Varied sentences flow smoothly. Sentence structure and length vary. Conventions /4: Punctuation, usage, and spelling are correct. Quotes are handled correctly and all PowerRules are followed. MLA format and citations are correct. Works cited page is correct.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

NRSG375 Clinical Leadership
Assessment Task 2: Online Forum Posts
This assessment task requires you by the due date and time to compose and submit 3 original posts
supported by the contemporary literature and referenced accordingly into the designated online
forums in your campus tile in response to topics/questions listed. You are also required to engage in
the online forum by posting a response to a peer(s) post(s) to the three questions also supported by
the contemporary literature and referenced accordingly. Each of your original posts has a word
limit of 150 words and each of your response posts has a word limit of 100 words (+/- 10%). The
topics for which are based on content from Modules 1 & 2, Modules 3 & 4 and Modules 5 & 6
respectively:
Topics:
Post 1 – Modules 1 & 2.
Clinical leadership is not an important consideration to a graduate RN. It is more important to
increase my confidence and improve my clinical skills to be a competent clinician. Critically reflect
and discuss in your first online post (ensure you support your point of view with contemporary
literature) Modules 1 & 2. (LO2)
Post 2 – Modules 3 & 4.
Autonomy and accountability are inherent to nursing as a profession. How do these professional
expectations related to leadership qualities enable the RNs practice? Critically reflect and discuss
this for your second online post (ensure you support your point of view with contemporary
literature) Modules 3 & 4. (LO4).
Post 3 – Modules 5 & 6
What elements enable and enhance positive change and innovation in the health
care environment, should I be contributing to as a graduate RN? Critically reflect
and discuss this for your third online post (ensure you support your point of view
with contemporary literature) Modules 5 & 6. (LO5)
NB. Response Posts to Forums (posts 4,5,6): You will also respond in each of the
Online discussion forums in your campus tile to posts made by a peer(s).
You will post your original and response posts on the topic to your campus online
forum by 0900 on Wednesday 23rd September 2021.
Each of your original posts has a word limit of 150 words and each of your response
posts has a word limit of 100 words (+/- 10%). Your posts and your responses are
required to completed and posted to the forums by the due date. All posts (3+3)
must then be submitted as one collated word document to enable the provision of
feedback to the Turnitin dropbox. Your submission needs to be in one Word document of
your original posts and response posts (in word format) including references; AND
you will also need to submit screenshots of all your forum posts in their entirety and
include as a part of the document in addition to the posts that you have included in word
format AND submitted to turnitin by the due date.
Please submit these as part of the document submitted for assessment task 2 in a single
document.
(750 words in total [3+3 posts] +/- 10%)
The expectation is that you use the contemporary literature to support your view in responding to
the topics/questions for your online posts for this assessment task. The following link may assist you
to do that https://leo.acu.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=1888100
Referencing is integral to academic writing, in the Faculty of Health Sciences, the prescribed
referencing convention is the APA referencing style. You may wish to revisit these requirements at
the following link https://leo.acu.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=1888106&chapterid=116998
Please refer to this rubric for this assessment task as a further guide to assessment expectations.
Criterion Referenced Rubric: Assessment 2 – Online Forum Posts (15%)

Applied Clinical Dissertations (Non-Empirical)

Applied clinical dissertations supported by the LA Clinical PsyD program use scientific reasoning (e.g., critical thinking, knowledge of scientific methodology) to produce a critical review of empirical and practice-based literature; and to develop a scholarly and innovative product, of clinical or psychoeducational value, grounded in the literature. The literature review portion of the dissertation can be either analytic or integrative in nature, depending on the scope of the overall project, but must always conclude with a section that provides support for product development based on deductive argumentation (i.e., departing from well-known principles or tested theories). Analytical literature reviews: contrast at least two viewpoints based on empirical and practice based literature to arrive at an unbiased understanding of the strengths and shortcomings of each viewpoint. Personal communications with known experts in the field may be cited in the literature review to help fill in gaps. Examples include (1) multiple perspectives on how to handle therapy termination with children; (2) multiple approaches to fostering socioemotional development in children with autism spectrum disorder; and (3) multiple approaches to development and implementation of anti-bullying programs for elementary school children.

Integrative literature reviews: bring together well-established literature from more than one field of study within psychology, or from multiple disciplines, to arrive at a broader understanding of a clinical problem and/or a new way to address the problem. This type of review summarizes important findings in each field and for this reason may rely more heavily on non-empirical literature (e.g., other reviews, textbooks). Personal communications with known experts in the integration of these multiple fields or disciplines may be cited in the literature review to help fill in gaps. Examples include (1) a family centered approach for treating entertainers with substance use problems (this dissertation would integrate substance abuse literature, with sociology literature about entertainment culture, and literature about systems theory); and (2) yoga as a complementary practice in the treatment of children who have been exposed to domestic violence (this dissertation would integrate yoga literature, with trauma literature, and literature about interdisciplinary approaches to care). Applied clinical dissertation products can be (1) adaptations of existing treatments or psychoeducational manuals for use with new clinical populations; (2) compilations of resources for mental health professionals who deliver services to a specific clinical population or community; or (3) a new therapeutic game, children’s book, app, or another product that could be used in conjunction with psychotherapy to improve clinical outcomes. NOTE: These are examples of acceptable products. Applied clinical dissertations must also include a product evaluation component, in which a group of experts will be asked to rate the quality of the product or give some other form of feedback to the student. It is expected that few students will opt to complete this type of dissertation given that it requires advanced knowledge, or special skills or resources, to be able to develop a high-quality product.

Formatting is APA 7^th edition

Required Contents of the Non-Empirical Clinical Dissertations All non-empirical clinical dissertation proposal drafts should contain the following elements:

Title Page

Abstract

Table of Contents

Chapter I: Introduction

Chapter II: Literature Review

Chapter III. Product Development and Review

References

Appendices

Country Health System PowerPoint Presentation Instructions